FBI attempts to question Chicago international solidarity activists. Don’t talk to FBI!
On November 15, three FBI agents came to the Chicago home of an international solidarity
The following is being circulated by the Rights Working Group and can be viewed by clicking here.
Dear President Obama,
We write as a group of national, statewide and community organizations, to share our concern about the FBI raids that occurred on Friday, September 24, 2010. We are also deeply concerned about the grand jury subpoenas that were served on the victims of those raids and others. These raids come on the heels of a report by the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General documenting recent examples of the FBI monitoring activists engaged in protected political speech without evidence of criminal behavior.
These raids suggest an ongoing trend of intrusive government surveillance of progressive activists in the United States. Prosecutions for protected political activity have a chilling effect, not just in the communities in which they occur, but also on the First Amendment rights of all Americans. We call on Congress to initiate an investigation into FBI activities that appear to be targeting legitimate political speech and assembly. We also call on the Department of Justice to revisit and amend the Attorney General’s Guidelines and the FBI’s implementing Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide to better respect fundamental constitutional protections.
Articles about the raids report that, according to government agents, there was no imminent threat—but that the warrants cited “material support for terrorism” as a reason for the searches. We are concerned that the material support laws are being used to harass and scare progressive activists as well as Muslim, South Asian, and Arab communities in a way in a way that violates even the limited First Amendment rights recognized by the Supreme Court in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.
Law enforcement scrutiny—whether in the form of covert physical or electronic surveillance, raids targeting information about protected political activity, or grand jury subpoenas demanding detailed information about protected political activity—discourages activists and political dissidents from exercising their legitimate and protected First Amendment freedoms of speech and assembly.
The raids targeted anti-war, Palestinian solidarity and Colombian solidarity activists. The recurring nature of such targeted surveillance and policing of activists working on these particular issues conveys the impression, for many, that although the rights to free speech and assembly are constitutionally protected, certain types of speech enjoy less protection. This flies in the face of the principle behind these critical constitutional protections – that speech may not be punished based on content or viewpoint. There is a lengthy record, indeed, of grand juries being used to intimidate and harass activists, and we caution the Obama administration not to become part of that history.
The timing of these actions gives further cause for concern. The raids were conducted within a month and a half of an election. This is not the first time that such actions were taken in the run up to an election: in 2004, during the weeks and months before the presidential election, the government contacted thousands of mostly Muslim men for “voluntary interviews” with the FBI in Operation Frontline. Such programs create a severe chilling effect on the willingness of individuals from vulnerable communities to engage in protected political activity, including voting. Engaging in such surveillance and policing near an election when there is no imminent threat of danger sends a message that the government may retaliate against the exercise of First Amendment rights.
The Attorney General’s Guidelines that govern FBI activities have been steadily eroded, such that the FBI now has the broad power to identify targets for investigation based at least in part on their race, ethnicity or religion. The Guidelines allow the FBI to open “assessments” with no factual predicate (i.e., without any basis at all for the individualized suspicion constitutionally required to justify a stop or search), and eliminate many of the protections put in place to reign in FBI abuses laid bare by the Church Committee that investigated COINTELPRO. The current Guidelines, and the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG) that implements them, harken back to the abuses that lead to the initial restrictions imposed by the Attorney General’s Guidelines in the first place.
We request that Congress initiate a robust investigation to examine FBI activities, including the practice of targeting protected political speech and assembly. We meanwhile ask the Department of Justice to amend the FBI Guidelines and implementing DIOG to better respect fundamental constitutional norms. The raids of this past week are part of a larger pattern, reflecting a disturbing trend that must be stopped if our nation remains committed to justice and equality.
CC: Eric Holder, Attorney General
United States Congress